The Bridge

Post details of your T gauge layouts and the progress you are making.
Post Reply
User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

A simple name......but its the most appropriate name for my next layout. That is if you can call it a "layout"!

My next project is to create an exhibition display of the Uk's (if not the world's) best known railway bridge...the Forth crossing. The layout will be somewhere around 25 foot long and only 2 feet deep. The track plan is simply a long...very long dog-bone loop..with a switchable dead section at either end and separate controllers for the Northbound and Southbound legs.

The bridge is going to be totally 3D printed in as close to scale realism as I can get within the feasibility of construction. So far, I've made some progress in 3D modelling some of the many components need to create the structure. Here's an assembled centre tower with the discrete components all in different colours:
Bridge3DC.jpg
Bridge3DC.jpg (45.14 KiB) Viewed 29201 times
The north and south towers are not as long, but are similar to each other, and each of the six cantilever sections are the same. So, once I;ve cracked one whole section, its simply a matter of reprinting. Did I say "simply"??

And here's a partial assembly of some of the parts I've printed so far. The red parts are final or close to final; the white parts are the initial sample print. First one side:
IMG_0955_red.JPG
IMG_0955_red.JPG (50.12 KiB) Viewed 29201 times
One of the feet atop its caisson:
IMG_0956_red.JPG
IMG_0956_red.JPG (30.68 KiB) Viewed 29201 times
And finally, the lower cross lattice girder:
IMG_0957_red.JPG
IMG_0957_red.JPG (32.15 KiB) Viewed 29201 times
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

peterg
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:25 am
Location: Nr Rugby, Warwickshire

Re: The Bridge

Post by peterg »

Wish i was clever! Great project Doug......guess you live in a long narrow house to manage a 25 foot layout :lol:

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

Errrr........no!

In fact I don't have anywhere inside that I'll be able to set the layout up!

I'll have to rely on the weather forecast!
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

martink
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:13 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Bridge

Post by martink »

That's impressive... And I was impressed by the 1.5m trestle bridge on Orbost!

mattd10
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:12 pm
Location: West Sussex, UK
Contact:

Re: The Bridge

Post by mattd10 »

Couldn't you have gone for something smaller to at least give others a chance of outdoing you ;)
I may have to do a scale replica of the channel tunnel (all out of sight of course) just the portals :D

But seriously, this looks bloomin amazing and cannot wait to see it take shape!

Sent from mobile device

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

There are two reasons for choosing the Forth bridge as my number two layout....

Firstly, I wanted something that would challenge my skills in using the latest technology in modelmaking. I don't like doing easy things!! So far I've had about a 50% failure rate when printing most of what I've done so far. And I'm talking about single prints taking up to 8 hours!!

And secondly, I wanted to do something with a "Wow" factor that would get the scale noticed. Most who have seen T gauge have seen it as a novelty. I want to change that..and make the sceptics think twice before dismissing it. Most think of the novelty factor...the track around the rim of a hat, inside a toilet seat or a briefcase. I want them to talk about modelling railways in T...and the capabilities of such a small scale. The Forth bridge is impracticable in all other scales....but not in T!

I'm anticipating the build to take many months. I have the overall layout sketched out in memory...and on scraps of paper. The bridge itself is something like 18 feet long overall...and I'm planning loops behind angled scenic backdrops at either end...and a painted backdrop to try and give some feel of depth. I already have a set of folding tables that line up to give an 8 metre long and 600mm wide platform to assemble the sections on...which will probably be 1 metre lengths to match the table sizes.

As yet, I've not decided which way to orientate the bridge. Do I place it facing West with the road bridge in the background....or facing east with the estuary as the backdrop?? The latter may win the day so the bridge is not obviously dated....so I can run almost anything across it. The only non-realistic thing will be that the bridge will have no scaffolding screening any part of it. It'll be between coats of paint!!

I'll post updates and photos as often as there's something new to show.....
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

peterg
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:25 am
Location: Nr Rugby, Warwickshire

Re: The Bridge

Post by peterg »

Sounds like it will certainly WOW the sceptics when it's done Doug!
Your determination to quiet these people is great....still being new to the game i have no axe to grind as such but i do hate the dyed in the wool tendency where change and product evolution is concerned. Remember when computers were the size of the front room. Mobile phones have far more computing power than took men to the moon. Carry on the good work.

How will you join the various sections on a regular basis for exhibitions and the like ??

Pete

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

I haven't thought that deep into the design yet.....but I'll probably use dowels for location and either "turnbuckle" fasteners or bolts/wingnuts to secure sections of the board.

The bridge will be pre-assembled in sections and the caissons will locate loosely on supports fixed to the layout board...and current thoughts are for the track to be connected with flexi-joiners and the bridge sections held together with discreetly located nuts/bolts.

And I'm open to thoughts on how to get acres and acres of water surface with the right amount of waves!! :shock:
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

peterg
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:25 am
Location: Nr Rugby, Warwickshire

Re: The Bridge

Post by peterg »

Hope this doesn't sound too way out but ;

Supposing you had a relatively high speed fan playing on the water fluid from the moment it was poured until the point that it sets....would that make waves or shall i just go back to sleep ;)

PS: Or just tell people that it's a calm day.

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

Here's a first version of one of the fifteen viaduct girder sections. Printed in two pieces; the road bed and the girderwork:
Img_0968_red.jpg
Img_0968_red.jpg (38.13 KiB) Viewed 28988 times
Img_0967_red.jpg
Img_0967_red.jpg (41.02 KiB) Viewed 28988 times
Flexi-track slides neatly into the two slots on the top of the road bed section with the rail head flush with the top surface. With each section slightly over 4 1/2 inches long, the viaduct one end is just under 23 inches long...and the other between 45 and 46 inches long. Yikes...I'll need to build in space for a track joint part way down the Queensferry viaduct! :shock:

Its incredible to think that when they built the bridge, these 168 ft long sections were assembled on partly built columns...and then jacked up bit by bit to allow the column to be built up underneath. Victorian engineering at its best!!
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

User avatar
tjejojyj
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: The Bridge

Post by tjejojyj »

Hi Doug

What source material did you use as the basis of you CAD model?
Do you find there is a maximum or optimal size and thickness of components you print?

I'm thinking that 3D printing would be a good way to make a version of the Landwasser Viaduct and Langwieser Viaduct for the Rhatishe Bahn layout I'm planning. It would be nice to make them to scale.

I'll add my 2 cents to say I eagerly look forward to seeing images of your completed layout. It sounds wonderful.

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

What source material did you use as the basis of you CAD model?
Everything I have so far has either been downloadable images from the internet...downloaded on the basis of "personal non-commercial use only", and three books on the subject of the bridge that I have purchased. Fortunately, lots of people have posted photos of the bridge...and a good "engineer's eye" can get a lot of information from a few pictures!!
Do you find there is a maximum or optimal size and thickness of components you print?
This is a simple question...to which I wish there was a simple answer! Alas, there isn't. The differing 3D printing technologies and systems have totally different printing capabilities.

Take a look at the design criteria for the differing materials available from Shapeways for example. The minimum wall thickness and detail tolerances differ wildly between the materials. And the minimum dimensions for the hot extrusion method that the Makerbot printer I have ( and all other similar printers) are actually different in each of the x-y-z axes. For instance, extruding through a 0.4mm diameter nozzle give an extruded bead of 0.4mm wide, so its impossible to have a vertical wall thickness of less than 0.4mm, whereas its perfectly possible to extrude a layer that is 0.2 mm thick! You have to be quite inventive on how to utilise the printing process! ;)

Perhaps forum members may be willing to pass on their experiences of 3D printing in the so-named forum section.


Gosh! What a subtle hint that was! :shock: :shock: ;)
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

Another component drafted out. Needs detailing, hollowing out and a mounting insert designing...but we're getting there!
IMG_0975_red.JPG
IMG_0975_red.JPG (48.8 KiB) Viewed 15417 times
Let me see....I'll need thirteen of them. 8-)
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

After many hours of 3D detailing work, I finally have some textures on the viaduct supports. Here's the before and after...and the after version took a whopping three hours to print!!
IMG_0977_red.JPG
IMG_0977_red.JPG (62.67 KiB) Viewed 15887 times
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

Slarge
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:22 am

Re: The Bridge

Post by Slarge »

Woah! :shock: you modelled all that texture? How?
Seriously how? Are they truncated pyramids or something?
Bricks are things we would never even consider modelling at this scale when making architectural models 3D viz, 3D for Printing or the Old school scalpel scored cardboard.
You just pushed the boundaries of modeling at this scale yet again!

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

Basically, I found out quite quickly that at this scale we have to design not for the detail....but for how the printer prints.

To illustrate this, here's what the model looks likes in my 3D package:
TextureDetail.jpg
TextureDetail.jpg (60.75 KiB) Viewed 15862 times
Compare the 3D model with the finished article. They're similar...but to get the end result, I have to exaggerate some of the surface shaping. And the rest is down to sheer trial and error!

And getting that level of detail for brickwork took hours and hours of repetitive dividing lines up and joining the dots! And then every sticking out node (forming the centres of the bricks) was moved out individually!
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

User avatar
tjejojyj
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: The Bridge

Post by tjejojyj »

That looks really good. From the first photo it looks like you have copied a 'block' pattern about ten times up the column.

(I was just thinking about asking whether such surface texture was possible at this scale as it is a facet of the Landwasser Viaduct.)

martink
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:13 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Bridge

Post by martink »

What you are doing is very, very impressive. While 3D is pretty much essential for the complex ironwork, have you considered using more traditional modelling techniques for simple bits like the pillars? The old trick of sticking suitably embossed plasticard onto wooden piers springs to mind.

User avatar
dkightley
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: The Bridge

Post by dkightley »

With wanting to get as near to true scale as possible, I only thought of using 3D modelling to get the level of results I was looking for. And it also allows me to produce pre-production parts so I can make absolutely sure things fit together exactly how I want.

For example, with the tower "hot off the press", here's an example of all pre-production parts assembled together for the first time! And with the HST placed almost in the right place, it gives an ides of the scale of the structure.
IMG_0983_red.JPG
IMG_0983_red.JPG (54.66 KiB) Viewed 15838 times
There's four separate parts here...all of which are not in their final form, but knowing they fit together, I can press on with the time consuming detailing.

btw This tower is actually the largest single component volume-wise in the whole bridge! And it happens to be a key component in the design, as I now know exactly how high the track bed will be above the waterline...so I can now work on the roadway sections for the centre tower, which I have partly produced.

I had doubts as to whether I would be able to pull this project off. I'm starting to feel slightly confident that I might just succeed!
Doug Kightley
Webmaster here and volunteer at the National Tramway Museum http://www.tramway.co.uk

peterg
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:25 am
Location: Nr Rugby, Warwickshire

Re: The Bridge

Post by peterg »

Seeing the parts together...with the train, just confirms how great this will be.
I think we will be seeing you in a magazine with this one at some point!!

Post Reply