Board index Talking T Gauge Forum T Gauge Layouts

Post details of your T gauge layouts and the progress you are making.

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby msimister » Mon Aug 03, 2015 3:36 am

Looks really good. What have you used for your telegraph wires? Has anyone tried human hair?
Cheers,
Malcolm
msimister
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 6:18 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Pas de Trois Zm on T track

Postby Nutter » Mon Aug 03, 2015 11:40 am

Malcolm the wires are done with EZ Line.
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby Nutter » Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:33 pm

Back in the zone , ready to start the layout again.
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby clives » Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:35 pm

msimister wrote:Looks really good. What have you used for your telegraph wires? Has anyone tried human hair?
Cheers,
Malcolm


Referring to telegraph wires..I was looking at the 'Stretchy' wire on the Tgauge.com site.....I see this is quoted at 0.005mm diameter.....this is too small surely and only equates ( using 1:450 ) to 2.25mm prototypical. This is too small for telegraph wires, let alone overhead catenary. Is there a reason for this, like it doesn't look right if to correct scale ?.
I'm basing my thoughts on telegraph wires being around 6 to 8mm thick ..which should be 0.013mm + .

Clive
clives
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:12 am

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby clives » Sun Aug 23, 2015 9:05 pm

Answering my own question here.. after a lot of Googling I discovered that BR and GPO wires were generally about 3mm diameter....so the Stretchy stuff is about right for telegraph wires. Will have to order some when back in stock....but will go for the black colour....only need about 24 ft of the stuff...so a reel should keep me going for a while !.

Cheers
Clive


Referring to telegraph wires..I was looking at the 'Stretchy' wire on the Tgauge.com site.....I see this is quoted at 0.005mm diameter.....this is too small surely and only equates ( using 1:450 ) to 2.25mm prototypical. This is too small for telegraph wires, let alone overhead catenary. Is there a reason for this, like it doesn't look right if to correct scale ?.
I'm basing my thoughts on telegraph wires being around 6 to 8mm thick ..which should be 0.013mm + .

Clive[/quote]
clives
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:12 am

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby Nutter » Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:18 pm

Clive the line I use is the EZline fine which according to their website is 0.25mm dia.
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby Nutter » Fri Sep 25, 2015 2:14 pm

Not a lot to report at present, apart from writing the first 2 idiots guides model railways are taking a back seat to model railways at least until the far end of October
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby Nutter » Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:47 am

Things are slowly starting to move again, have just ordered some 6mm wargame models- buildings, figures and vehicles to see how they look. What I have done is buy 2 or 3 items from different suppliers to compare the quality and actual sizes.
Once received they will be compared with existing products that I have which work.
The Timecast buildings are very successful but looking at others from ranges covering Europe especially France, Belgium and possibly Spain.
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby martink » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:37 am

6mm wargame stuff? Hmmm. That 6mm size number generally refers to a human figure's eye height, typically 5 feet or thereabouts, so happens to be roughly the same as the track gauge for a model railway scale. So 6mm works out to about Z gauge, while 3mm figures and models are more appropriate for T. And alas, there isn't much 3mm stuff available. On the other hand, it all depends on what you have ordered - the exact scale may not matter too much.
martink
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:13 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: T Gauge based Zm Layout

Postby Nutter » Thu Oct 08, 2015 1:53 pm

martink wrote:6mm wargame stuff? Hmmm. That 6mm size number generally refers to a human figure's eye height, typically 5 feet or thereabouts, so happens to be roughly the same as the track gauge for a model railway scale. So 6mm works out to about Z gauge, while 3mm figures and models are more appropriate for T. And alas, there isn't much 3mm stuff available. On the other hand, it all depends on what you have ordered - the exact scale may not matter too much.


Buildings being slightly undersize actually does not look too bad. Waiting on the vehicles and people.
6mm wargame horses are actually very good for Z scale wagons, have a couple that I have used in the past.
Mike
DON'T knock it at least I am trying to do something, with only one good hand.
User avatar
Nutter
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:05 pm
Location: S E London

PreviousNext

Return to T Gauge Layouts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests